Managing patients with high-risk asthma
Patients with highly variable lung function, marked bronchial
hyperreactivity, and poor perception of breathlessness are at high risk for
fatal or near-fatal asthma. Respiratory arrest may occur minutes after the onset
of asthma symptoms.

Click here to view full-size graphic
Patients with high-risk asthma are those more likely to require hospitalization,
emergency department (ED) visits, or to experience fatal or near-fatal episodes
of asthma. High-risk asthma is characterized by
- Low resting pulmonary function
- Wide variations in pulmonary function
- Marked bronchial hyperreactivity
- Poor perception of one's own pulmonary status
- Severe mold sensitivity
- Past hospitalizations and ED visits for asthma, particularly if intensive
care with intubation was required.
| Drugs mentioned in this article |
Albuterol Beclomethasone (Beclovent, Vanceril)
Budesonide (Pulmicort Respules, Pulmicort Turbuhaler)
Cromolyn (Intal)
Flunisolide (AeroBid, AeroBid-M)
Epinephrine Fluticasone (Flovent/Flovent Rotadisk)
Fluticasone/salmeterol (Advair Diskus)
Formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer)
Methylprednisolone (A-Methapred, Solu-Medrol)
Montelukast (Singulair)
Nedocromil (Tilade)
Prednisolone Prednisone Salmeterol (Serevent, Serevent Diskus)
Theophylline Triamcinolone acetonide (Azmacort)
Zafirlukast (Accolate)
Zileuton (Zyflo)
|
Patients classified as having severe persistent asthma, who need chronic corticosteroid
treatment, are likely to be in this high-risk group. Pregnant women who require
corticosteroid treatment are often included because of the danger to themselves
and the fetus. Patients with significant comorbid conditions are also at high
risk. Although the elderly are frequently placed in this category as well, many
of the patients who experience unexpected, profound bronchospasm with the potential
to proceed quickly to respiratory arrest and death are younger than 25. Children
10 to 14 years old are particularly susceptible to fatal and near-fatal asthma.
Factors that may increase the risk in children include
- Poor adherence to treatment
- Inappropriate use of metered-dose inhalers (MDIs)
- Poor self-management skills (denial of the disease)
- Increased atopic sensitivity.
Inhabitants of the inner city, particularly people of lower socioeconomic status, continue to experience the greatest burden of morbidity and mortality from asthma. Various factors have been suggested to explain this association, including increased exposure to cockroach allergen, exhaust fumes, and cigarette smoke; poorer access to health care; lower educational status; and possibly a more severe expression of the disease in African Americans. The rate of ED visits for asthma among African Americans during the period from 1992 to 1999 was more than 3 times the rate for whites.2
A fatal or near-fatal asthma attack is usually a prolonged episode lasting days or weeks and marked by a slow, steady decline in pulmonary function. A fulminant form, sometimes called sudden asphyxic asthma (SAA), may also occur. Respiratory arrest may occur 30 to 60 minutes after the onset of symptoms in a patient with SAA. Many patients with SAA have recently been discharged from the hospital or ED after treatment for asthma.
ASSESSMENT OF RISK STATUS
The physical examination and history are always important parts of the patient
evaluation. The diagnosis of asthma, assessment of its severity, and determination
of the patient's risk category are based on pulmonary function studies or spirometry,
however.
History and physical examination
A history of previous respiratory arrest or sudden attacks of severe bronchospasm
leading to asphyxia places patients at increased risk of another, similar episode.
The occurrence of a seizure during an asthma attack is a particularly ominous
sign. Determining the patient's stress level may be helpful because distressing
events may precipitate SAA in some patients. In assessing risk status, ask how
often the patient has had daytime symptoms during the past week and how often
nighttime symptoms have occurred in the previous month. Asthma is an episodic
disease in which lung function can vary significantly within a short period
of time. Severity is categorized according to frequency of symptoms as well
as lung function (see "Stepwise approach to asthma in adults and children aged
5 years and older"). Asthma severity is often underestimated because assessments
are not based on objective lung function testing and the frequency with which
patients use bronchodilators. Frequency of bronchodilator use, a good measure
of symptom frequency, was associated with near-fatal asthma in a recent case-control
study.3 Indices of asthma severity should be reassessed frequently
in patients with asthma.
GUIDELINE |
Stepwise approach to asthma in adults and children aged 5 years and
older |
| Classify severity: Clinical features before treatment or
adequate control | Medications required to maintain long-term control |
| Symptoms by day
Symptoms by night | PEFR or FEV1
PEFR variability | Daily medications |
Step 4 Severe persistent | Continual ___________ Frequent | <60% _____ >30% | Preferred treatment High-dose inhaled corticosteroids AND Long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists AND, if needed, |
| Corticosteroid tablets or syrup long term (2 mg/kg/d, generally
do not exceed 60 mg/d). Make repeat attempts to reduce systemic corticosteroids
and maintain control with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. |
Step 3 Moderate persistent | Daily __________ >1 night/wk | >60% to <80% ___________ >30% | Preferred treatment Long to medium dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting inhaled
beta2-agonists. |
Alternative treatments (listed alphabetically) Increase inhaled corticosteroids within medium-dose range OR Low to medium dose inhaled corticosteroids and either leukotriene modifier
or theophylline |
Step 2 Mild persistent | >2/wk but <1/d ___________ >2 nights/mo | >80% ________ 20%-30% | Preferred treatment Low-dose inhaled corticosteroids |
Alternative treatments (listed alphabetically) Cromolyn, leukotriene modifier, nedocromil OR Sustained-release theophylline
to serum concentration of 5-15 mcg/mL |
Step 1 Mild intermittent | <2d/wk ___________ <2 nights/mo | >80% ______ <20% | No daily medication needed |
| Severe exacerbations may occur, separated by long periods
of normal lung function and no symptoms. A course of systemic corticosteroids
is recommended. |
| All patients | Short-acting bronchodilator: 2-4 puffs short-acting inhaled
beta2-agonists as needed for symptoms. Intensity of treatment
depends on severity of exacerbation; up to 3 treatments at 20-minute intervals
or a single nebulizer treatment as needed. Course of systemic corticosteroids
may be needed. Use of short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists on
a daily basis, or increasing use, indicates the need to initiate or increase
long-term control therapy. |
Step down Review treatment every 1 to 6 months; a gradual
stepwise reduction in treatment may be possible.
Step up If control is not maintained, consider step up. First, review
patient medication technique, adherence, and environmental control. | Note: The stepwise approach is meant to assist, not replace, the
clinical decision-making process required to meet individual patient needs.
Classify severity: assign patient to most severe step in which any feature
occurs (PEFR is percent of personal best; FEV1 is percent predicted).
Gain control as quickly as possible (consider a short course of systemic
corticosteroids); then step down to the least medication necessary to
maintain control.
Provide education on self-management and controlling environmental factors
that worsen asthma (eg, allergens and irritants).
Refer to an asthma specialist if there are difficulties controlling
asthma or if step-4 care is required. Referral may be considered if step-3
care is required.
|
Key: FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate. Source: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel.
The Executive Summary of the NAEPP Expert Panel Report: Guidelines for the
Diagnosis and Management of AsthmaUpdate on Selected Topics 2002.
Bethesda, Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2002. NIH publication
02-5075. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/index.htm . Accessed
November 15, 2002. |
The physical examination rarely holds clues to the possibility of SAA. The fast onset of symptoms in SAA does not correlate with measures such as respiratory rate, pulse rate, BP, use of accessory muscles of respiration, lung hyperinflation on chest radiography, or ECG findings such as cardiac arrhythmias.1
Pulmonary function testing
An objective measure of lung function should be obtained at the initial evaluation,
with any change in patient status, and at least annually. Patients may not perceive
the severity of their disorder for several reasons. First, someone who has never
experienced good asthma control may become accustomed to even very severe symptoms.
A patient with lung function that is only 60% of the predicted value may rate
his symptoms as a 10 on a 10-point scale, indicating excellent symptom control.
In addition, a small percentage of patients have a specific inability to perceive
their own breathlessness.
The primary purpose of spirometry is to detect reductions in percent predicted
of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Using the percent
predicted value corrects for the patient's age, height, weight, gender, and
race. An FEV1 that is 80% or more of the predicted value is considered
normal. Additional data obtained from spirometry include the forced vital capacity
(FVC) and the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. A reduced FEV1 to
FVC ratio indicates obstructive lung disease, which occurs most commonly with
asthma or emphysema. The severity of disease is determined from the FEV1 level. A low value for resting pulmonary function, an FEV1 of less
than 60% of predicted for example, is associated with a high risk for hospitalization.
If the FEV1 is less than 30% of predicted in a patient with asthma,
immediate hospitalization is recommended. A pattern of highly variable or gradually
deteriorating pulmonary function is also associated with an increased risk of
death from asthma.
If spirometry is unavailable, the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) should
be obtained at each visit. This measure is effort-dependent, however, and its
routine use has not been demonstrated to improve outcome. The major benefit
of the peak flow meter is in-home use, especially for patients who find it difficult
to accurately assess the severity of their symptoms. A wide diurnal variation
in PEFR, which is related to altered perception of breathlessness, has been
consistently associated with risk of a life-threatening episode of SAA.1
MANAGEMENT OF THE ACUTE EPISODE
Episodes of severe bronchospasm with rapidly progressive dyspnea often proceed from relatively asymptomatic to full respiratory arrest in a matter of minutes. The patient may not have an opportunity to summon help. Sudden mucus plugging and overwhelming allergen exposure are possible mechanisms by which these attacks occur. Acute stress has also been proposed as a possible precipitating factor. Attacks frequently occur in the early morning, as do most asthma-related ED visits and hospital admissions. The diurnal variation of severe asthma attacks may occur because of lowered serum levels of endogenous epinephrine and cortisol in the early morning hours and increased responsiveness to inhaled allergens and histamine at night.1
It is not possible to determine when the patient presents whether a severe asthma attack will become a fatal or near-fatal episode. Patients at high risk for SAA may have a higher incidence of silent chest on auscultation than those with a slower onset of symptoms. In this situation, a silent chest is caused by severe bronchospasm and poor air movement.
Patients undergoing rapid decompensation from SAA must be brought immediately
to the ED. Initial management includes oxygen administration, IM epinephrine
(the treatment of choice), mechanical ventilation (if indicated), IV corticosteroids,
and nebulized beta2-agonists. Antibiotics are recommended in acute
asthma exacerbations only for patients with fever and purulent sputum, evidence
of pneumonia, or suspected bacterial sinusitis.4
MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC DISEASE
Patients who are subject to near-fatal asthma attacks should be seen by a
physician at least monthly. They should also have periodic consultations with
a pulmonologist or allergist so that their medical program can be reviewed and
additional education provided. Chronic management of the high-risk asthma patient
requires combination therapy with rescue and controller medication (see Table
1).
GUIDELINE |
TABLE 1 Long-term control medications: Usual adult dosages |
| Medication | Dosage form | Dosage |
| SYSTEMIC CORTICOSTEROIDS |
| Methylprednisolone | 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-mg tablets | 7.5-60 mg/d in a single dose
in the morning or qod as needed for control |
| Prednisolone | 5-mg tablets, 5 mg/5 mL, 15 mg/5 mL |
| Prednisone | 1-, 2.5-, 5-, 10-, 20-, 50-mg tablets; 5
mg/mL, 15 mg/mL | Short-course burst to achieve control: 40-60
mg/d in a single dose or 2 divided doses for 3-10 d |
| CROMOLYN, NEDOCROMIL |
| Cromolyn | MDI, 1 mg/puff | 2-4 puffs tid-qid |
| Nebulizer, 20 mg/ampule | 1 ampule tid-qid |
| Nedocromil | MDI, 1.75 mg/puff | 2-4 puffs bid-qid |
| INHALED LONG-ACTING
BETA2-AGONISTS* |
| Formoterol | DPI, 12 mcg/single-use capsule | 1 capsule q12h |
| Salmeterol | MDI, 21 mcg/puff | 2 puffs q12h |
| DPI, 50 mcg/blister | 1 blister q12h |
| COMBINATION MEDICATION |
| Fluticasone/salmeterol | DPI, 100, 250, or 500 mcg/50 mcg | 1 inhalation bid; dosage depends on asthma
severity |
| LEUKOTRIENE MODIFIERS |
| Montelukast | 4- or 5-mg chewable tablet; 10-mg tablet | 10 mg qhs |
| Zafirlukast | 10- or 20-mg tablet | 40 mg/d in 2 divided doses |
| Zileuton | 300- or 600-mg tablet | 2400 mg/d (give tablets qid) |
| METHYLXANTHINE |
| Theophylline | Liquids, sustained-release tablets, and
capsules | Starting dosage, 10 mg/kg/d up to 300 mg
max; usual max, 800 mg/d |
Key: DPI,
dry powder inhaler; MDI, metered-dose inhaler. Note: See Table 2, for estimated high dosages for
inhaled corticosteroids. *Not used for symptom relief, exacerbations, or without inhaled corticosteroids.
Monitor to maintain serum concentrations at 5-15 mcg/mL. Source: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel. The
Executive Summary of the NAEPP Expert Panel Report: Guidelines for the Diagnosis
and Management of AsthmaUpdate on Selected Topics 2002. Bethesda,
Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2002. NIH publication 02-5075.
Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov . Accessed November 15, 2002. |
Rescue treatment
Rapid-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilators such as albuterol, used
as needed to provide immediate relief from an attack, are the mainstay of rescue
treatment for asthma. Bronchodilation occurs within about 5 minutes of use.
Of the 4 categories of asthma severity, only patients with intermittent asthma
can be treated with a beta2-agonist bronchodilator alone.
Patients who have experienced previous SAA attacks or with risk factors for
SAA should be trained in emergency measures in the event of a severe bronchospastic
episode. These patients should wear a medical alert bracelet and carry an epinephrine
kit.
Controller medication
Patients with mild persistent, moderate persistent, and severe persistent asthma require a controller medication, usually an inhaled corticosteroid. Only patients with mild intermittent asthma are exempt from the need for controller medications.
Corticosteroids In assessing the need for controller medication,
the most effective of which are inhaled corticosteroids, think of the "rule
of 2s": If a patient has asthma symptoms or needs to use a beta2-agonist
bronchodilator more than twice a week in the daytime or more than twice a month at night, he or she should be using a controller medication. The available
evidence from studies comparing inhaled corticosteroids to other controller
medications show that none are as effective as inhaled corticosteroids in improving
asthma outcome. Another way of gauging the need for controller medications is
by the length of time a beta-agonist inhaler lasts. In general, an inhaler should
last 10 to 12 months; any patient who requires more than 2 such inhalers
within 1 year should be using controller medication. Patients who fulfill these
criteria and are already taking a controller medication should be using the
combination of a long-acting bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid. An alternative
regimen consists of a leukotriene antagonist and an inhaled corticosteroid.
Inhaled corticosteroids may be delivered through an MDI, popularly called
a puffer, a dry powder inhaler (DPI), or a nebulizer. Used properly, MDIs are
as effective as nebulizers, are less expensive to use, and are easier to transport.
The learning curve associated with MDIs is steep, however. Patients must be
taught how to use MDIs properly and how to determine when the container is empty
(shaking an empty MDI can produce misleading sounds). The specific inhaled corticosteroid
that is prescribed often depends on the formulary of the patient's insurance
plan. The dosages of the available products are notably variable, however (see
Table 2). In general, the complications of inhaled corticosteroids are minimal
and are related to the dosage and duration of use.
TABLE 2 Estimated high dosages for inhaled corticosteroids |
| Drug | High dosage (adult) | High dosage (children) |
Beclomethasone CFC (42 or 84 mcg/puff)
Beclomethasone HFA (40 or 80 mcg/puff)
Budesonide DPI (200 mcg/inhalation)
Flunisolide (250 mcg/puff)
Fluticasone MDI (44, 110, or 220 mcg/puff)
Fluticasone DPI with salmeterol (50, 100, 250, or 500 mcg/inhalation)
Triamcinolone acetonide (100 mcg/puff) | >840 mcg
>640 mcg
>1200 mcg
>2000 mcg
>660 mcg
>600 mcg
>2000 mcg
| >672 mcg
>320 mcg
>800 mcg
>1250 mcg
>440 mcg
>400 mcg
>1200 mcg
|
Key: CFC,
chlorofluorocarbon; DPI, dry powder inhaler; HFA, hydrofluoroalkane; MDI,
metered-dose inhaler. Note: Dosages are daily cumulative dosages and are usually administered
as 2 divided dosages. Children are defined as patients aged 12 years and
younger. Source: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel.
The Executive Summary of the NAEPP Expert Panel Report: Guidelines for the
Diagnosis and Management of AsthmaUpdate on Selected Topics 2002.
Bethesda, Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2002. NIH publication
02-5075. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov . Accessed November 15,
2002. |
Patients whose asthma falls in the severe-persistent category may require an oral corticosteroid for several weeks to stabilize pulmonary function, along with the combination of a long-acting bronchodilator plus an inhaled corticosteroid, or high doses of an inhaled corticosteroid. In particular, patients with wide variability in PEFR that is unaffected by aggressive therapy with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting bronchodilator are candidates for oral corticosteroids. These patients are best referred for treatment by a specialist, who should make every effort to reduce dosages of the oral agents and, eventually, maintain control with inhaled agents. IV corticosteroids are rarely used for chronic management but may be employed in hospitalized patients.
Other controller medications Long-acting beta2-agonists
such as salmeterol and formoterol may be used to prevent asthma-induced or exercise-induced
bronchospasm; their prolonged onset of action precludes their use as rescue
medication. Long-acting beta2-agonists do not treat the underlying
disease, however, and should not be used as the sole controller medication.
Instead, they are prescribed as add-on therapy for patients already using an
inhaled corticosteroid.
Leukotriene-modifying drugs are alternative controller medications. Although they have not been shown to be as effective as corticosteroids, they may be used as corticosteroid-sparing agents, particularly for patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The available agents include montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton.
The mast cell stabilizers cromolyn and nedocromil are most useful in children when there is concern regarding inhibition of long bone growth from inhaled corticosteroids. Although these agents are not as effective as inhaled corticosteroids, they may be an alternative for children with mild asthma.
Skin testing and immunotherapy
Because the majority of patients with asthma are atopic, it is reasonable
to refer patients to an allergist for assessment of environmental triggers (which
may include skin testing) and education about allergen avoidance. There is evidence,
too, that patients with a widely variable PEFR, who are at increased risk of
life-threatening episodes, have a greater degree of atopy than other asthma
patients.5 Immunotherapy has a demonstrated benefit in patients with
allergic rhinitis and asthma with allergic triggers. It has also been shown
to help prevent sensitization to new allergens and reduce the risk of developing
asthma among patients with allergic rhinitis. Even if immunotherapy is not indicated,
patients will benefit from knowing what allergens they react to and learning
how to avoid those substances.
Control of associated diseases
A large percentage of patients with asthma are atopic; that is, they have
a genetic predisposition to develop an IgE-mediated response to aeroallergens.
These patients are likely to have allergic rhinitis as well as asthma. Although
they may not request treatment for their nasal symptoms, therapy for this condition
may improve asthma symptoms.6 Rescue treatment for allergic rhinitis
consists of antihistamines (with or without decongestants), and controller treatment
is provided by nasal corticosteroids. Control of sinus disease is also important
because a chronic sinus infection can worsen asthma.
PracticePoint |
Effective telephone triage procedures |
An asthma patient, particularly a high-risk one, presents a difficult
clinical problem. The last thing anyone needs is for the patient to suffer
a severe attack while he or she is seeking medical help. Asthma patients
who call your practice when they have a cold or difficulty breathing usually
assume that you know they have asthma. Do you?
A good triage system alerts you and your staff to a potentially critical
situation like this one. A telephone protocol that requires asking a patient
with congestion, heaviness in the chest, or any other respiratory problem
whether she is an asthma sufferer is a first step. Unfortunately, humans
err, and a staffer may forget or unintentionally ignore the protocol.
But just as you have charts with color-coded dots to alert personnel to
allergies, another brightly colored dot might alert your staff to the
fact that a patient is being treated for asthma. Even better, flag these
patients in your computerized scheduling system. Once your receptionist
calls up the patient's record, the flag alerts your staff to the potential
gravity of the situation. In the best systems, an alert takes over the
computer screen and cannot be ignored.
Once your staff is alerted, your protocol should specify pathways. Under
what conditions should
- The call be referred to you?
- The patient be called to the office?
- The patient sent to the emergency department or referred for immediate
attention by a specialist?
This careful planning is well worth the effort in every primary care
practice.
This PracticePoint was contributed by practice management consultant
GEOFFREY T. ANDERS, The Health Care Group, Plymouth Meeting, Pa. |
PRODUCED BY MARY DESMOND PINKOWISH
REFERENCES
1. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami U, et al. Surveillance
for asthma--United States, 1980-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:1-13.
Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5101a1.htm . Accessed
November 15, 2002.
2. O'Hollaren MT. Warning signs that an asthmatic may
be prone to a fatal or near-fatal attack. Paper presented at: 58th Annual Meeting
of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; March 5, 2002;
New York, NY.
3. Mitchell I, Tough SC, Semple LK, et al. Near-fatal
asthma: a population-based study of risk factors. Chest. 2002;121:1407-1413.
4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. NAEPP Expert
Panel Report. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma--Update
on selected topics 2002. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov . Accessed November
15, 2002.
5. Miles J, Cayton R, Ayres J. Atopic status in patients
with brittle and nonbrittle asthma: a case-control study. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995;25:1074-1082.
6. Corren J. Allergic rhinitis and asthma: how important
is the link? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:S78l-S786.
SUGGESTED READING
Allergic Disorders Task Force Members and Organizations. The
Allergy Report: ScienceBased Findings on the Diagnosis & Treatment
of Allergic Disorders. Available at: http://www.theallergyreport.org . Accessed
November 15, 2002.
Haby MM, Peat JK, Marks GB, et al. Asthma in preschool children:
prevalence and risk factors. Thorax. 2001;56:589-595.
Lipworth BJ. Systemic adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid
therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:941-955.
Marik PE, Varon J. Oral vs inhaled corticosteroids following
emergency department discharge of patients with acute asthma. Chest. 2002;121:1735-1736.
MARK O'HOLLAREN, MD, Director, The Allergy Clinic, and Clinical
Professor of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
TINA HARTERT, MD, MPH, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division
of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Health Services
Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
Managing patients with high-risk asthma. Patient Care 2003;1:14-38.